Digg vs. Wikinews

Wikinews and Digg are both Internet sources that rely on user input and feedback to further their goal of providing reliable, relevant information to users. Though both value the opinions of their readers, each encourages user participation on wikinews1different levels.

Wikinews aims to be an avenue for neutral, unbiased news by examining view points from all relevant sides. The site’s creators and users aspire to maintain this reliability by encouraging contributors to cite their sources and maintain neutrality. The site has a simple interface that is easy to learn and use. Once you become a registered user, you can submit and edit articles in a similar process to that of Wikipedia.

Wikinews designates two types of articles: synthesis and original reporting. The synthesis articles draw on already published stories, while original stories are contributed by users with firsthand experience. The site actively discourages any opinionated commentaries, advising users “if you want to tell the world what you think, try blogging.” There is an “Opinion” section for those diggwho wish to participate in discussions about news stories.

While Wikinews is created purely for the sake of compiling an impartial account of current events articles, Digg does not attempt to influence the contributions or feedback from its users. Digg’s main goal is to employ user opinion to determine the value of a given entry. It functions by allowing members to post pieces they find interesting.

Unlike Wikinews, Digg is not restricted to impartial news articles; users can post commentaries and Youtube videos as well. Members can rate these entries with a “Digg” or “Bury”. Digg” indicates a favorable opinion; the objects with the highest number of “Diggs” are put on the main page. “Bury” indicates something you find objectionable; pieces with significant “Bury” feedback alert the site’s managers who may decide to remove the entry.

Between Wikinews and Digg, Digg seems much more useful in a news search. Though its main page is not devoted to stories that are considered more traditionally news (politics, government, the economy, scientific advancements, etc.), these stories are easily accessible. There are category tabs for technology, business, and entertainment; you can also search all entries using the search bar. Wikinews is heavily edited in order to maintain a level of impartiality, which is admirable; however, the articles on Digg are all pre-published from presumably reliable sources. Though an individual article might fall short on impartiality, a variety of articles discussing the same subject will likely provide enough different view points for the reader to understand differing perspective.

Advertisement

1 Comment »

  1. chasewolf said

    I have to agree with this post that of the two sites digg seems more useful, this is mainly because it takes what is a popular post and allows everyone to know about it. Wiki news is more of a search and you’ll find what your looking for kind of site which is good if you know what your looking for but this doesn’t give insite into the best articles. Digg succeeds in over wiki because it allows you to find the most useful articles, based on user reviews, their for you will find not only the article your looking for but also a high quality one at that.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.